Monday, May 14, 2012

Reading in English class

Why should kids read when they can just go on Wikipedia and look up the same information? You want me to learn about discrimination between blacks and whites? I won’t read The Color of Water; I’ll go on the internet and research it. Why do high school teachers force their students to read? It’s not the information about the book that teachers are trying to make you understand, it’s the lesson learned in the novel. In The Color of Water, James is a half-black, half-white child. His mother is white and his father is black. The book takes you through the journey and hardships of growing up in a black community when your mother is white. He’s half black so the whites don’t respect him and he’s half white so the blacks don’t respect him. Yes, you could learn about discrimination through research on Wikipedia or you could SparkNotes the book, but why do that when you can experience, first hand, exactly what it’s like to be a race that no one likes? SparkNotes doesn’t tell you about how the Chicken Man helped James realize the type of man he didn’t want to be. Wikipedia doesn’t tell you how someone feels when their mother rides a bike and sings to herself. Google doesn’t explain how a white woman feels when she is pregnant with a black man’s child, whom she loves, but can never be with. The fact that it’s James McBride experiencing the racism of his time doesn’t really matter. It’s the fact that you are applying knowledge you’re learning to an actual plot-based story.

9 comments:

  1. If kids don't want to read these books, they aren't going to, and they won't be punished for it. They'll look up a summary, ask a friend, or whatever, get the information and pass the tests. And since they passed, it reinforces that it's a good idea to not read. Kids don't want to read these books, and they don't. So if they want us to read, they should change the books, because nothing else will make them read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I looked the summary up on sparknotes, and it has all that you said in it with no dialogue making ti a much easier process and quicker, with this I could check the sumary and get back to better things to do without having to read that book which was a challenge not to burn

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the Color of Water was decent but they just wanted to show us that racism was huge back sixty years ago. I think this book wasn't the way to do it. I agree with you Britt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Many kids do think, why should I read the book when i can just look it up on sparknotes? Most kids end up doing just that, looking up the book on sparknotes and never actually reading the book. Maybe if kids could read some more current books they may actually open the book.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really didn't like the Color of Water because I thought it was boring and irrelevant to modern day society. Black and white people get married all the time now, and it's not a big deal at all. I think that we should all know that skin color doesn't matter by now, so there isn't really any point to reading this book, so long as you know that we're all equal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thats a good point you cant research on google how a white woman feels while shes pregant with a black mans child. you have to read the book to experience that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You're right that you can't get all aspects of a book through online research, and that in order to do that you need to actually read the book. I somewhat enjoyed Color of Water but I think that it wasn't the best book for the point they were trying to make.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think your right that you cant get everything from SparkNotes, but if the books the same then would it really matter if you read the book?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree that sparknoting something is not the same as reading it. you do not get the small joys of reading the book.

    ReplyDelete